French President Emmanuel Macron has helped coordinate the response to Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine, however he has pursued a distinct tack than his fellow European leaders. Over the previous couple of months, he has saved a dialogue open with the Russian premier whereas others minimize ties, however the try at diplomacy seems to have backfired as a latest announcement from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky suggests he has crossed a line.
Throughout an interview with Italian broadcasters Rai on Might 13, President Zelensky accused Mr Macron of working to assist Putin “save face”.
He known as out the French President throughout the Porta a Porta present, accusing him of suggesting Ukraine forfeit a few of its territories to appease Russia.
Mr Zelensky stated his nation was not “on Russian soil” and that his folks wished the invading military to “depart our land”.
He added: “We gained’t assist Putin save face by paying with our territory. That might be unjust.”
READ MORE: Russia in flames: Military recruitment centre torched in arson assault
The try to seek out “a approach out for Russia” was made in useless, he stated, whereas France claimed Mr Macron had by no means made the suggestion.
Elysee officers took to social media to dispute Mr Zelensky’s claims, stating that he hadn’t advocated concessions for Russia.
Anne-Sophie Bradelle, Mr Macron’s worldwide communications advisor, stated: “The French President has by no means ever mentioned something with VVP [Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin] with out President Zelensky’s consent and has by no means requested him for any concession.
“He has at all times stated that it was as much as the Ukrainians to resolve the phrases of their negotiations with the Russians.”
Whereas France has denied Mr Zelensky’s accusation, the quotes he handed on echo others made in an EU Parliament deal with earlier this month.
On Might 9, President Macron laid out his imaginative and prescient for a peaceable Europe to attendees at a Strasbourg convention.
After the battle ends in Ukraine, he stated, Europe wants “new safety balances” and to “by no means give in to the temptation of humiliation”.
Alongside the “spirit of revenge”, he claimed that they had “already previously wreaked sufficient havoc on the roads to peace”.
Mr Macron has not modified his tack with Russia for the reason that nation began invading Ukraine in February.
Whereas different western leaders have communicated with a present of pressure, with sanctions and arms despatched to Mr Zelensky’s administration, he has pursued diplomacy.
His present and former positions have held that Russia is European, and he has often advocated for the nation’s safety.
In February, two weeks earlier than the invasion started, he stated: “There isn’t any safety for Europeans if there isn’t any safety for Russia”.
His deal with to Strasbourg is ideologically much like one other he delivered greater than a month earlier than the invasion.
On January 22 he advocated working with Russia to construct a “European order based on rules and guidelines to which we have now dedicated”.
He stated the bloc ought to adhere to rules it signed with Russia after the downfall of the Soviet Union.
In February 2020, he made an identical assertion when addressing a crowd on the Ecole de Guerre French navy academy.
The French President informed attendees he wished Russia to be a “constructive participant in our frequent safety”.
He stated Europe ought to strengthen its dialogue with Russia “at a time when the variety of safety points that have to be addressed with Moscow are rising”.
His latest pursuit of dialogue has seen him unwilling to come back down on Putin whereas discussing struggle crimes.
Whereas he admitted he was committing struggle crimes in Ukraine, Mr Macron refused to agree with US President Joe Biden that Putin was committing “genocide”.
In an interview with France 2 on April 13, he stated he wished to “watch out” and stop “escalation”.
He stated: “Thus far, it has been established that struggle crimes had been dedicated by the Russian military and that it’s now obligatory to seek out these accountable and convey them to justice.
“I’m very cautious with some phrases [genocide] nowadays. I am unsure the escalation of phrases helps the trigger proper now.”